Definition
In an APC context, local planning policy for inclusive environments refers to policies in a local planning authority’s adopted development plan that require or encourage accessible and inclusive design as a condition of granting planning permission. These sit within the national framework set by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). They operate alongside Building Regulations and health and safety legislation to create a multi-layered set of obligations. A surveyor must understand which instrument applies at which stage of a project.
Why this matters for Inclusive Environments
- You must explain the role of local planning policy, Building Regulations and health and safety law in securing inclusive environments.
- Planning conditions imposing M4(2) or M4(3) are legally binding once permission is granted and affect design, programme and cost.
- Building Regulations compliance is a separate statutory requirement to planning, with different processes and enforcement bodies.
- The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 require designers to consider usability in occupation, not only construction-phase safety.
Key principles
Local planning policy
The NPPF requires local plans to promote inclusive, accessible communities. Local authorities translate this into specific policies — some requiring a proportion of new dwellings to meet M4(2) or M4(3) standards, others producing supplementary planning documents on accessible design. Planning conditions are legally binding: failure to comply can lead to enforcement action and, in serious cases, a requirement to alter or demolish completed works. Candidates must check the adopted local plan and any supplementary planning documents before advising on which standard applies.
Building Regulations and Approved Document M
Part M of the Building Regulations 2010 and Approved Document M set the statutory baseline for accessible design in new buildings and certain material changes of use in England. Building regulations approval is a separate consent from planning permission, with different processes and a different enforcement regime (local authority building control or an approved inspector). Meeting Approved Document M does not automatically satisfy local plan accessibility policies, which may require a higher standard.
Health and safety legislation
The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) require the principal designer to ensure designers consider how the finished building will be used and maintained, including by disabled people. The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 imposes duties on employers to provide accessible workplaces for all employees. Both obligations apply throughout the building lifecycle.
How the three instruments interact
On a typical residential development, local plan policy sets which Part M category applies; Approved Document M sets the technical requirements; and CDM 2015 requires usability in occupation to be considered. All three apply concurrently. A surveyor advising on such a project should confirm local plan requirements, verify the design meets the required Part M category, and ensure CDM pre-construction information addresses access and usability in occupation.
Relevant RICS guidance and legislation
- National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) — requires local plans to promote inclusive and accessible communities.
- Building Regulations 2010, Part M and Approved Document M (Volumes 1 and 2) — the statutory baseline for accessible design in England.
- Equality Act 2010 — imposes ongoing reasonable adjustment duties independent of planning and building regulations compliance.
- Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 — require designers to consider usability and accessibility throughout the building’s lifecycle.
- Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 — employer duties to provide safe and accessible workplaces for all employees.
- BS 8300-1:2018 and BS 8300-2:2018 — frequently referenced in local plan policies and planning conditions as the best-practice standard.
- RICS Rules of Conduct (effective 2 February 2022) — Rule 2 (competence) requires accurate advice across all three regulatory layers.
Ethics and Rules of Conduct angle
Rule 2 requires RICS members to provide a competent service. Advising accurately across all three regulatory layers is not optional: a candidate who confirms planning permission but ignores building regulations compliance or CDM obligations risks a serious professional failure. Rule 4 (respect) reinforces this: the regulatory framework for inclusive environments exists to protect people historically excluded from the built environment, and advice that undermines it is both ethically and legally problematic.
APC-style Q&As
Q (Level 1)What is the role of local planning policy in securing inclusive environments?
Local planning policy translates national NPPF guidance into specific requirements for individual local authority areas. Policies may require a proportion of new dwellings to meet M4(2) or M4(3) standards, or impose accessible design conditions on commercial developments. Those conditions are legally binding once planning permission is granted.
Q (Level 1)Is building regulations approval the same as planning permission?
No. They are separate consent regimes with different purposes, processes and enforcement bodies. Planning permission controls whether development may take place; building regulations approval controls the technical construction standards, including accessibility under Part M. Both are typically required but are obtained separately and enforced by different authorities.
Q (Level 2)A developer has planning permission for 50 dwellings with an M4(2) condition. What further accessibility steps are needed before starting on site?
Building regulations approval is still required. The design must satisfy Approved Document M Volume 1 M4(2) technical requirements, verified by building control before works commence. The developer should also ensure the CDM 2015 pre-construction information addresses usability and maintenance access for the finished building, as required by those regulations.
Q (Level 2)How do the CDM Regulations 2015 engage with inclusive design?
CDM 2015 requires the principal designer to ensure designers consider how the building will be used and maintained in occupation, not just how it will be safely constructed. This includes access for disabled users. A design that meets Part M at handover but creates maintenance access difficulties for wheelchair users should be flagged during design and addressed in the health and safety file.
Q (Level 3)As project manager, you discover on site that accessible units have been built to M4(1) rather than the M4(2) planning condition. What do you do?
(example) I stopped the affected works and notified the client, principal contractor and building control in writing. The M4(2) planning condition is legally binding; non-compliance risks enforcement action. I commissioned remedial works to achieve M4(2) compliance, secured sign-off, and documented the defect. I also advised the client to consider disclosure to any registered provider, since M4(2) is often a funding condition for affordable units.